EPSTEIN
page 4 / 13 . OCR, unverified
D 730 Labor Management
Declaratory relief and state law claims
□ 290 All Other Real Property
..._./
D 550 CMI Rights
Reporting & Disclosure
for defamation
*AorB
Act
D 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant)
D 7 40 Railway Labor Act
D 871 IRS-Thiro Party 26 USC 7609
q/
D 790 Other Labor Lit~ation
D 791 Employee Ret. Inc.
SecurityActB
FILEOhv
I\
n "
VI. ORIGIN
.... 111.t,
1 l
X 1.
Original
□ 2. Removed from
□ 3. Remanded from
□ 4. Refilled
□ 6. Multidistrict Litigation
□7.
Appeal to District Judge from
JAN
2008
Proceeding
State Court
Appellate Court
□ 5. Transferred from another district
(Specify)
Magistrate Judgment
CLARENCE MA"""v
VII. REQUESTED
IN COMPLAINT
VIII. RELATED
CASE(S) IF ANY
DATE
d'-/ 0
CHECK IF THIS IS A
-
D UNDER F.RC.P. 23
(See Instructions):
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
S/F 1-2
REV. 9/94
□ CLASS ACTION
DEMAND$
□
Check Ye: ~ R;-,p,if r::'t' ... .,, .. I. CT.
t:,
• ,.."e8TinLAIJ(). YE )
complaint.
f
JURY DEMAND:
o NO
(SEE ATTACHED)
JUDGE ____________ _
DOCKET NUMBER
SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Receipt No.-~----
Date Paid: .5z;;;, t• 7
M/ifp:
==================== END OF Court Records__Doe v. Epstein, No. 908-cv-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008)__001.txt ====================
==================== DOCUMENT: Court Records__Doe v. Epstein, No. 908-cv-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008)__002.txt ====================
METADATA_SOURCE: Court RecordsDoe v. Epstein, No. 908-cv-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008)
METADATA_FILENAME: 002.pdf
----------------------------------------
Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 2 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
AO (Rev. 10/93) Summons in a Civil Action
United States District Court
Southern
DISTRICT OF Florida
SUMMONS
JANE DOE, by and through
JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural
guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and
JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
I
------------------
TO:
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, individually:
East 71st Street
New York, NY 10021
CASE NO. 08-80069
CIVMMARR/.i
ldA~STRAR. Jl.lll&
JAN 2 4 2008
CLARENCE MADDOX
CLERK U.S. DIST. CT.
S.D. OF FLA. • FT. LAUD.
IOHNSOB
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY,
Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218
Miami, Florida 33160
(305) 931-2200
an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this summons upon you,
exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the
complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk ofhis Court within a reasonable period of time after service.
JAN 2 4 2008
CLERK
DATE
(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
==================== END OF Court Records__Doe v. Epstein, No. 908-cv-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008)__002.txt ====================
==================== DOCUMENT: Court Records__Doe v. Epstein, No. 908-cv-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008)__003.txt ====================
METADATA_SOURCE: Court RecordsDoe v. Epstein, No. 908-cv-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008)
METADATA_FILENAME: 003.pdf
----------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.08-80069-CIV-MARRA
JANE DOE NO. 1 by and through
JANE DOE'S FATHER as parent and natural
guardian, and JANE DOE'S FATHER, and
JANE DOE'S STEPMOTHER, individually,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT
AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff’s counsel is
hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of
this order.
It is further ORDERED:
1. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that
motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed
order.
2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 16.1 and
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is
excluded under Rule 26(a)(1)(E), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the
filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, to consider the nature and
basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of
Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 2
the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a
proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties’ views and proposals concerning the matters
listed in Rule 26(f).
4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference
outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.